From the Dean of Learning and Teaching
Why Clarity and Challenge Matter for Learning
As part of our ongoing professional learning focus at St Laurence’s College, our teachers have recently been exploring an important question:
What Helps Students Engage Deeply in Learning?
Recent educational research suggests that students are more likely to disengage when learning feels passive, unclear or disconnected from purpose. Conversely, students are more likely to persist, participate and experience positive emotions towards learning when classrooms combine strong relationships, intellectual challenge and meaningful engagement.
This understanding is helping shape the ongoing development of our Agreed Practice Framework at Lauries.
At St Laurence’s College, we want our classrooms to be places where boys are not simply “completing work,” but actively thinking, discussing, questioning and engaging deeply with learning. Research guided by Control-Value Theory highlights that students are more motivated and experience less negative emotion when they perceive learning as both valuable and achievable. In simple terms, boys engage more deeply when they understand not only what they are learning, but why it matters and how they can succeed (Fredericks, J.A. et al, 2019).
This is why many of our Agreed Teaching practices are intentionally designed to increase cognitive engagement.
For example, many lessons begin with retrieval practice, which refers to short activities that require students to revisit prior learning from memory. While simple in appearance, retrieval strengthens understanding over time and helps students develop confidence through repeated success. Importantly, it shifts learning from passive recognition to active thinking.
Similarly, our teachers are continuing to build discussion-rich classrooms where boys are encouraged to explain ideas, justify reasoning, challenge perspectives respectfully and learn collaboratively. Research suggests that teacher support for collaboration and cognitive challenge is associated with higher student interest and lower negative emotions towards learning.
Another important feature of our Agreed Practice Framework is the use of explicit success criteria through the “What, Why, Success” structure increasingly visible across classrooms:
- What are we learning?
- Why does this matter?
- What does success look like?
When expectations are clear, students are more likely to feel a sense of control and purpose in their learning. Control-Value Theory suggests that this clarity matters greatly because uncertainty and confusion can contribute to anxiety, boredom and disengagement.
Recent research (Rubach C. et al, 2023) also suggests that students who develop genuine interest in learning are less likely over time to experience negative emotions such as boredom, frustration or disengagement. Importantly, the research indicates that this interest is strengthened when classrooms are cognitively engaging, collaborative and supportive. In other words, boys are more likely to persist when learning feels meaningful, achievable and intellectually active.
Importantly, engagement is not the same as entertainment. Boys often grow most when learning involves appropriate cognitive stretch: moments where they are challenged to think deeply, persist through difficulty and refine their understanding. Productive struggle, when paired with strong teacher support and clear guidance, is often where the most meaningful learning occurs.
At St Laurence’s College, our professional learning focus recognises that classroom culture and academic achievement are deeply connected. Through our Agreed Practice Framework, we are working to create classrooms characterised by clarity, challenge, belonging, and purposeful learning.
This reflects the spirit of an Edmund Rice education: one that seeks not only academic success, but the formation of young men who are engaged, reflective, confident and capable of contributing meaningfully to the world around them.
MS GRACE VISSER
Dean of Learning & Teaching
Works Consulted
Fredricks, J. A., Parr, A. K., Amemiya, J. L., Wang, M.-T., & Brauer, S. (2019). What Matters for Urban Adolescents’ Engagement and Disengagement in School: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(5), 491-527.
Rubach, C., Dicke, A., Safavian, N. & Eccles, J.S. (2023). Classroom transmission processes between teacher support, interest value and negative affect: An investigation guided by situated expectancy-value theory and control-value theory. Motivation and Emotion, 47(4), 575-594.